Publicación:
Lifers before the European Court of Human Rights: Reasons for Concern and Disappointment

Cargando...
Miniatura
Fecha
2018-06
Editor/a
Director/a
Tutor/a
Coordinador/a
Prologuista
Revisor/a
Ilustrador/a
Derechos de acceso
Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0 Internacional
Título de la revista
ISSN de la revista
Título del volumen
Editor
Bibliotheca
Proyectos de investigación
Unidades organizativas
Número de la revista
Resumen
Lifer´s human rights are still far from being properly acknowledged by the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR). Recent Grand Chamber judgments such as Vinter and others v. United Kingdom (2013), Murray v. The Netherlands (2016) and Hutchinson v. United Kingdom (2017) bring in some contradictions and inconsistencies that feature a rather poor and hypocritical defense of human dignity. Here is an attempt to explain some of these problems that call for a much more committed approach by the ECtHR in relation to those who might spend the rest of their life in prison.
Descripción
The registered version of this article, first published in Valahia University LAW STUDY, is available online at the publisher's website: Bibliotheca, https://www.analefsj.ro/fr/index.php
La versión registrada de este artículo, publicado por primera vez en Valahia University LAW STUDY, está disponible en línea en el sitio web del editor: Bibliotheca, https://www.analefsj.ro/fr/index.php
Categorías UNESCO
Palabras clave
European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR), European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR), lifers, life sentences, human dignity, right to hope, criminal dangerousness, public protection, re-socialization
Citación
Núñez Fernández, J.: “Lifers before the European Court of Human Rights: Reasons for Concern and Disappointment”, Supplement of Valahia University LAW STUDY Târgoviste (2018), pp. 100-109.
Centro
Facultad de Derecho
Departamento
Derecho Penal y Criminología
Grupo de investigación
Grupo de innovación
Programa de doctorado
Cátedra
DOI