Publicación: Apuntes sobre la autoridad de la res iudicata en la jurisprudencia del Tribunal de Justicia de la Unión Europea
Cargando...
Fecha
2021
Autores
Editor/a
Director/a
Tutor/a
Coordinador/a
Prologuista
Revisor/a
Ilustrador/a
Derechos de acceso
Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0 Internacional
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
Título de la revista
ISSN de la revista
Título del volumen
Editor
Facultad de Deusto
Resumen
El principio de seguridad jurídica tiene, como una de sus manifestaciones características, dentro del Estado de Derecho, la fuerza de cosa juzgada (res iudicata) que se atribuye a las sentencias o resoluciones judiciales equivalentes firmes, y que implica tanto su impugnabilidad como su potencial influencia en litigios posteriores que guarden una conexión con el asunto ya resuelto en firme. Sin embargo, es posible que estas decisiones judiciales firmes de jueces nacionales, por diversas causas (error, omisión, interpretación manifiestamente contraria, etc.) vulneren el Derecho de la Unión Europea y, por tanto, afecten tanto a su primacía como a su efectividad en sus relaciones con los ordenamientos jurídicos nacionales. El Tribunal de Justicia ha tenido oportunidad de enfrentarse al dilema de ponderar el principio de fuerza de cosa juzgada con las primacía y efectividad del Derecho de la Unión en diversas sentencias. Este trabajo tiene como objetivo realizar una aproximación y revisar la jurisprudencia más importante al respecto hasta la actualidad.
The principle of legal certainty has, as one of its characteristic manifestations, within the rule of law, the force of res judicata that is attributed to the final judgements or equivalent resolutions, which imply that it is not impugnable and also its potential influence on other cases with a connection to the matter already settled. However, it is possible that these final judicial decisions of national judges, for various reasons (error, omission, a manifestly contrary interpretation, etc.) violate the European Union law and, therefore, affect both its primacy and effectiveness in the relations with national legal systems. The European Court of Justice had the opportunity to confront the dilemma of balancing the principle of res judicata with the primacy and effectiveness of EU law in several cases. This work aims to develop an approximation and review of the most important cases related to this balance until today.
The principle of legal certainty has, as one of its characteristic manifestations, within the rule of law, the force of res judicata that is attributed to the final judgements or equivalent resolutions, which imply that it is not impugnable and also its potential influence on other cases with a connection to the matter already settled. However, it is possible that these final judicial decisions of national judges, for various reasons (error, omission, a manifestly contrary interpretation, etc.) violate the European Union law and, therefore, affect both its primacy and effectiveness in the relations with national legal systems. The European Court of Justice had the opportunity to confront the dilemma of balancing the principle of res judicata with the primacy and effectiveness of EU law in several cases. This work aims to develop an approximation and review of the most important cases related to this balance until today.
Descripción
Categorías UNESCO
Palabras clave
Cosa juzgada, res iudicata, seguridad jurídica, primacía, efectividad del Derecho de la UE, Res iudicata, legal certainty, primacy, EU law effectiveness
Citación
Centro
Facultad de Derecho
Departamento
Derecho Constitucional