Publicación: Work engagement: A meta-analysis using the job demands-resources model
Cargando...
Fecha
2021-12-10
Editor/a
Director/a
Tutor/a
Coordinador/a
Prologuista
Revisor/a
Ilustrador/a
Derechos de acceso
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
Licencia Creative Commons
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/deed.es
Título de la revista
ISSN de la revista
Título del volumen
Editor
Sage Journals
Resumen
Although the construct of work engagement has been extensively explored, a systematic meta-analysis based on a consistent categorization of engagement antecedents, outcomes, and well-being correlates is still lacking. The results of prior research reporting 533 correlations from 113 independent samples (k = 94, n = 119,420) were coded using a meta-analytic approach. The effect size for development resources (r =.45) and personal resources (r = .48) was higher than for social resources (r = .36) and for job resources (r = .37). Among the outcomes and well-being correlates explored, the effect size was highest for job satisfaction (r = .60) and commitment (r = .63).
Furthermore, moderation analysis showed that (a) concerning the occupational role, work engagement finds a low association with turnover intention among civil servants, volunteer workers, and educators; (b) collectivist cultural environments reported a greater association of feedback with engagement than individualistic environments; (c) the relationship between personal resources and engagement was stronger among workers with university degrees than workers with high school diplomas. Furthermore, the absorption dimension showed a lower effect with all variables under investigation than vigor and dedication.
Descripción
Categorías UNESCO
Palabras clave
work engagement, meta-analysis, job demands-R model, energy compass, job resources, personal resources
Citación
Mazzetti, G., Robledo, E., Vignoli, M., Topa, G., Guglielmi, D., & Schaufeli, W. B. (2023). Work Engagement: A meta-Analysis Using the Job Demands-Resources Model. Psychological Reports, 126(3), 1069-1107. https://doi.org/10.1177/00332941211051988
Centro
Facultades y escuelas::Facultad de Psicología
Departamento
Psicología Social y de las Organizaciones