Publicación: Etnografía de la escuela más allá de la etnografía y de la escuela: tensiones disciplinares y aplicabilidad de los saberes etnográficos
Cargando...
Fecha
2013
Autores
Editor/a
Director/a
Tutor/a
Coordinador/a
Prologuista
Revisor/a
Ilustrador/a
Derechos de acceso
Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0 Internacional
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
Título de la revista
ISSN de la revista
Título del volumen
Editor
Centro de Enseñanza Superior "Don Bosco"
Resumen
Si los saberes generados por la etnografía practicada en las escuelas han de tener alguna aplicabilidad, ésta se realizará por los agentes escolares. Los agentes escolares se conducen, sin embargo, en marcos sociocognitivos y valorativos que, en general, no concuerdan con los de una genuina etnografía de la escuela. Este ensayo retoma las encerronas derivadas de esta situación, tematizada clásicamente por los antropólogos de la educación. Al hilo de la argumentación se mostrarán los aspectos irrenunciables de una etnografía de las instituciones escolares desde el sociocentrismo de un antropólogo social. Además, se ofrecerá un contraste con el sociocentrismo de los agentes escolares. Estas dos formas de sociocentrismo constituyen en definitiva dos discursos legitimantes que entran frecuentemente en colisión como discursos disciplinares. Este ensayo ofrecerá claves para comprender esas colisiones y ofrecerá algunas perspectivas para generar una aplicabilidad que no parta de la premisa de una anulación de la agencia específicamente escolar.
If knowledge created by ethnography that is practiced in schools has any applicability, will be undertaken by school agents. However, these school agents lead themselves into socio-cognitive and appreciatory frameworks that, in general, do not agree with an authentic school ethnography. This essay summarizes the contradictions derived from this situation, which is usually discussed by anthropologists of education. Following the argumentation, the unavoidable aspects of the institutional school ethnography will be shown from the point of view of the sociocentrism of a social anthropologist. Moreover, a contrast with the sociocentrism of the school agents will be presented. Both types of sociocentrism are absolutely legitimate, but they frequently clash as disciplinary fields. This essay will also show some keys to understanding these contradictions and will provide some perspectives to generate a way of applying this theory that does not start from the false assumption of the suppression of the school agency.
If knowledge created by ethnography that is practiced in schools has any applicability, will be undertaken by school agents. However, these school agents lead themselves into socio-cognitive and appreciatory frameworks that, in general, do not agree with an authentic school ethnography. This essay summarizes the contradictions derived from this situation, which is usually discussed by anthropologists of education. Following the argumentation, the unavoidable aspects of the institutional school ethnography will be shown from the point of view of the sociocentrism of a social anthropologist. Moreover, a contrast with the sociocentrism of the school agents will be presented. Both types of sociocentrism are absolutely legitimate, but they frequently clash as disciplinary fields. This essay will also show some keys to understanding these contradictions and will provide some perspectives to generate a way of applying this theory that does not start from the false assumption of the suppression of the school agency.
Descripción
Categorías UNESCO
Palabras clave
etnografía de la escuela, conceptos de cultura y educación, sociocentrismo escolar, sociocentrismo etnográfico, school ethnograph
Citación
Centro
Facultad de Filosofía
Departamento
Antropología Social y Cultural