Publicación: Los ultrajes a la bandera en España y el clamor general del Consejo de Europa: análisis comparativo de la Sentencia del TEDH Fragoso Dacosta c. España
Cargando...
Fecha
2023-10-10
Autores
Editor/a
Director/a
Tutor/a
Coordinador/a
Prologuista
Revisor/a
Ilustrador/a
Derechos de acceso
Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0 Internacional
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
Título de la revista
ISSN de la revista
Título del volumen
Editor
Iustel
Resumen
La condena del Tribunal Europeo de Derechos Humanos (TEDH) a España en el asunto Fragoso Dacosta c. España (2023) resucita la polémica doctrinal y jurisprudencial existente en nuestro país en relación con la tipificación en nuestro Código Penal de ciertos delitos llamados “delitos de opinión”. Esta sentencia del TEDH hace referencia al delito de ultrajes en la bandera, contemplado en nuestro Código Penal y castigado con una multa que, de no ser cumplida, se convertiría en una pena de prisión. En este sentido, es interesante comparar el asunto Fragoso Dacosta con otros suscitados ante la instancia judicial del Consejo de Europa y en el ámbito interno español. El análisis comparado de la jurisprudencia del TEDH y de la jurisprudencia interna en referencia al ataque contra símbolos nacionales nos permite llegar a conclusiones relevantes sobre los delitos concernientes a dichos ataques y a la necesidad de reforma del Código Penal español.
The European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) Judgment to Spain in the case Fragoso Dacosta v. Spain (2023) has resurrected the Spanish doctrinal and jurisprudential controversy in relation to the classification in our Criminal Code of certain crimes called "crimes of opinion". This ECHR’s Judgment deals with the crime of outrages to the flag. The outrage to the flag is a crime covered by the Spanish Criminal Code and it can be punished by a fine or a prison sentence. In this sense, it is interesting to compare the Fragoso Dacosta case with other cases raised before the judicial body of the Council of Europe and before the domestic courts. The comparative analysis of the ECHR jurisprudence and the internal jurisprudence in reference to the attack against national symbols allows us to reach relevant conclusions about this kind of crimes and the need to reform the Spanish Criminal Code.
The European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) Judgment to Spain in the case Fragoso Dacosta v. Spain (2023) has resurrected the Spanish doctrinal and jurisprudential controversy in relation to the classification in our Criminal Code of certain crimes called "crimes of opinion". This ECHR’s Judgment deals with the crime of outrages to the flag. The outrage to the flag is a crime covered by the Spanish Criminal Code and it can be punished by a fine or a prison sentence. In this sense, it is interesting to compare the Fragoso Dacosta case with other cases raised before the judicial body of the Council of Europe and before the domestic courts. The comparative analysis of the ECHR jurisprudence and the internal jurisprudence in reference to the attack against national symbols allows us to reach relevant conclusions about this kind of crimes and the need to reform the Spanish Criminal Code.
Descripción
Categorías UNESCO
Palabras clave
Delitos de opinión, libertad de expresión, Tribunal Europeo de Derechos Humanos, Tribunal Constitucional, ultrajes a la bandera, Offence of opinion, expression freedom, European Court of Human Rights, Constitutional Court, outrage to the flag
Citación
Centro
Facultad de Derecho
Departamento
Derecho Internacional Público