Publicación:
Disagreeing to Agree: Populism and Consensus Among Members of Parliaments and Their Voters

Vista sencilla de ítem
dc.contributor.authorPamies, Carles
dc.contributor.authorOlivas Osuna, José Javier
dc.contributor.authorSantana, Andrés
dc.contributor.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-4993-2178
dc.contributor.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-2594-1360
dc.date.accessioned2024-10-25T11:47:06Z
dc.date.available2024-10-25T11:47:06Z
dc.date.issued2024
dc.descriptionThe registered version of this article, first published in “American Behavioral Scientist", is available online at the publisher's website: Sage Journals, https://doi.org/10.1177/00027642241285017 La versión registrada de este artículo, publicado por primera vez en “American Behavioral Scientist", está disponible en línea en el sitio web del editor: Sage Journals, https://doi.org/10.1177/00027642241285017
dc.description.abstractPopulism is theoretically associated with an antagonistic interpretation of politics. Populists tend to morally delegitimize their adversaries, exhibit “bad manners” toward them, and sometimes even try to exclude them from “the people.” They are also more inclined to prioritize radical policy and institutional changes. Therefore, populism appears to be directly at odds with consensus politics. This research aims to empirically test this relationship. Using two original surveys focused on the Spanish context, we investigate the relationship between populist attitudes and the propensity to consensual political solutions, examining both citizens and their political representatives. Our results confirm that populist attitudes contribute to low support for consensual approaches toward politics among both members of parliament (MPs) and citizens, but this relationship depends on the individual’s specific dimensions of populism. Anti-systemic and moral Manichaean attitudes are associated with less consensual preferences both for MPs and citizens, whereas people-centrist and identitarian populist attitudes exhibit this negative effect only among citizens. These results provide new insights into the ramifications of populist attitudes and underscore the importance of empirically examining the concept of populism across its various dimensions.en
dc.description.versionversión publicada
dc.identifier.citationPamies, C., Olivas Osuna, J. J., & Santana, A. (2024). Disagreeing to Agree: Populism and Consensus Among Members of Parliaments and Their Voters. American Behavioral Scientist, 0(0). https://doi.org/10.1177/00027642241285017
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1177/00027642241285017
dc.identifier.issn0002-7642 | eISSN 1552-3381
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14468/24118
dc.journal.titleAmerican Behavioral Scientist
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherSage Publications
dc.relation.centerFacultades y escuelas
dc.relation.departmentCiencia Política y de la Administración
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/deed.es
dc.subject59 Ciencia Política
dc.subject.keywordspopulismen
dc.subject.keywordsconsensusen
dc.subject.keywordsSpainen
dc.subject.keywordsattitudesen
dc.subject.keywordsideological congruenceen
dc.titleDisagreeing to Agree: Populism and Consensus Among Members of Parliaments and Their Votersen
dc.typeartículoes
dc.typejournal articleen
dspace.entity.typePublication
relation.isAuthorOfPublicationa5505bbf-47f8-41b5-ba7f-46b20168923e
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscoverya5505bbf-47f8-41b5-ba7f-46b20168923e
Archivos
Bloque original
Mostrando 1 - 1 de 1
Miniatura
Nombre:
Olivas Osuna-Santana 2024-disagreeing.pdf
Tamaño:
338.53 KB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Descargar
Bloque de licencias
Mostrando 1 - 1 de 1
No hay miniatura disponible
Nombre:
license.txt
Tamaño:
3.62 KB
Formato:
Item-specific license agreed to upon submission
Descripción:
Descargar
Colecciones
Artículos y papers