Publicación:
Disagreeing to Agree: Populism and Consensus Among Members of Parliaments and Their Voters

Cargando...
Miniatura
Fecha
2024
Editor/a
Director/a
Tutor/a
Coordinador/a
Prologuista
Revisor/a
Ilustrador/a
Derechos de acceso
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
Título de la revista
ISSN de la revista
Título del volumen
Editor
Sage Publications
Proyectos de investigación
Unidades organizativas
Número de la revista
Resumen
Populism is theoretically associated with an antagonistic interpretation of politics. Populists tend to morally delegitimize their adversaries, exhibit “bad manners” toward them, and sometimes even try to exclude them from “the people.” They are also more inclined to prioritize radical policy and institutional changes. Therefore, populism appears to be directly at odds with consensus politics. This research aims to empirically test this relationship. Using two original surveys focused on the Spanish context, we investigate the relationship between populist attitudes and the propensity to consensual political solutions, examining both citizens and their political representatives. Our results confirm that populist attitudes contribute to low support for consensual approaches toward politics among both members of parliament (MPs) and citizens, but this relationship depends on the individual’s specific dimensions of populism. Anti-systemic and moral Manichaean attitudes are associated with less consensual preferences both for MPs and citizens, whereas people-centrist and identitarian populist attitudes exhibit this negative effect only among citizens. These results provide new insights into the ramifications of populist attitudes and underscore the importance of empirically examining the concept of populism across its various dimensions.
Descripción
The registered version of this article, first published in “American Behavioral Scientist", is available online at the publisher's website: Sage Journals, https://doi.org/10.1177/00027642241285017 La versión registrada de este artículo, publicado por primera vez en “American Behavioral Scientist", está disponible en línea en el sitio web del editor: Sage Journals, https://doi.org/10.1177/00027642241285017
Categorías UNESCO
Palabras clave
populism, consensus, Spain, attitudes, ideological congruence
Citación
Pamies, C., Olivas Osuna, J. J., & Santana, A. (2024). Disagreeing to Agree: Populism and Consensus Among Members of Parliaments and Their Voters. American Behavioral Scientist, 0(0). https://doi.org/10.1177/00027642241285017
Centro
Facultades y escuelas
Departamento
Ciencia Política y de la Administración
Grupo de investigación
Grupo de innovación
Programa de doctorado
Cátedra