Publicación: Normas éticas y estadísticas en la justificación de los ensayos clínicos aleatorizados
Cargando...
Fecha
2006-01-01
Editor/a
Director/a
Tutor/a
Coordinador/a
Prologuista
Revisor/a
Ilustrador/a
Derechos de acceso
Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0 Internacional
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
Título de la revista
ISSN de la revista
Título del volumen
Editor
Resumen
In this paper we analyse how to combine the statistical justification of the results obtained in a randomised clinical trial and the ethical and social arguments that support its implementation. We try to show how this justification varies according to the view on probability we adopt and the different ethical cases that can be made to sustain it. We will see that both the frequentist and the Bayesian approaches to the design of clinical trials are equally defensible on these grounds. We will defend that to be socially acceptable both approaches must meet an impartiality requirement, which is best served by the technique of randomisation.
Descripción
Categorías UNESCO
Palabras clave
bioethics, randomisation, impartiality, medical experimentation, probability
Citación
Centro
Facultad de Filosofía
Departamento
Filosofía y Filosofía Moral y Política