Publicación:
The irrelevancy of the inter-trial interval on delay-discounting experiments on an animal model of ADHD

dc.contributor.authorSjØberg, Espen .A.
dc.contributor.authorJohansen, Espen Borgå
dc.contributor.authorRamos Villaverde, Sergio
dc.contributor.authorLópez Tolsa Gómez, Gabriela Eugenia
dc.contributor.authorPellón Suárez de Puga, Ricardo
dc.date.accessioned2024-05-20T11:53:13Z
dc.date.available2024-05-20T11:53:13Z
dc.date.issued2021-06-25
dc.description.abstractDelay discounting involves choosing between a small, immediate reward, and a larger but delayed one. As the delay between choice and large reward gets longer, people with ADHD tend to become impulsive faster than controls, indicated by a switch in preference from the large to the smaller reward. Choosing the smaller reward when the larger is considered reward maximizing is labeled impulsive behaviour. It is well documented that increased delays between choice and reward affects choice preference in both humans and other animals. Other variables such as the inter-trial interval or trial length are observed to have an effect on human discounting, but their effect on discounting in other animals is largely assumed rather than tested. In the current experiment, we tested this assumption. One group of rats was exposed to increasing delays between choosing the large reward and receiving it, while another group experienced longer inter-trial intervals that were equal in length to the delays in the other group. This ensured that trial length was controlled for in delay discounting, but that the delay function and inter-trial intervals could be manipulated and measured separately. Results showed that while the delay between choice and reward caused impulsive behaviour in rats, the length of the inter-trial interval (and by extension trial length) had no impact on choice behaviour. A follow-up experiment found this to be the case even if the length of the inter-trial interval was signaled with audio cues. These results suggest that rats, and possibly animals in general, are insensitive to time between trials, and therefore cannot easily represent human counterparts on the task.es
dc.description.versionversión publicada
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbr.2021.113236
dc.identifier.issn0166-4328 - eISSN 1872-7549
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14468/12674
dc.journal.titleBehavioural Brain Research
dc.journal.volume408
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherElsevier
dc.relation.centerFacultad de Psicología
dc.relation.departmentPsicología Básica I
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/deed.es
dc.subject.keywordsDelay discounting
dc.subject.keywordsTrial length
dc.subject.keywordsAnimal testing
dc.subject.keywordsADHD
dc.subject.keywordsImpulsivity
dc.subject.keywordsPatience
dc.titleThe irrelevancy of the inter-trial interval on delay-discounting experiments on an animal model of ADHDes
dc.typejournal articleen
dc.typeartículoes
dspace.entity.typePublication
relation.isAuthorOfPublication6b52a943-952e-4026-99ba-75fa6c333a0f
relation.isAuthorOfPublicationba8ed850-8d02-456c-8d85-9290e6c6bab9
relation.isAuthorOfPublication8edbde84-9307-47aa-9ef8-5e85de175df6
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery6b52a943-952e-4026-99ba-75fa6c333a0f
Archivos
Bloque original
Mostrando 1 - 1 de 1
Cargando...
Miniatura
Nombre:
Pellon_Suarez_Ricardo_BBR2021.pdf
Tamaño:
1.72 MB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format