Publicación:
Gaia Focused Product Release:Asteroid orbital solution. Properties and assessment

dc.contributor.authorDavid, Patrice
dc.contributor.authorMignard, F.
dc.contributor.authorHestroffer, D.
dc.contributor.authorTanga, P.
dc.contributor.authorSarro Baro, Luis Manuel
dc.date.accessioned2024-05-20T11:41:41Z
dc.date.available2024-05-20T11:41:41Z
dc.date.issued2023-12-08
dc.description.abstractContext. We report the exploitation of a sample of Solar System observations based on data from the third Gaia Data Release (Gaia DR3) of nearly 157 000 asteroids. It extends the epoch astrometric solution over the time coverage planned for the Gaia DR4, which is not expected before the end of 2025. This data set covers more than one full orbital period for the vast majority of these asteroids. The orbital solutions are derived from the Gaia data alone over a relatively short arc compared to the observation history of many of these asteroids. Aims. The work aims to produce orbital elements for a large set of asteroids based on 66 months of ccurate astrometry provided by Gaia and to assess the accuracy of these orbital solutions with a omparison to the best available orbits derived from independent observations. A second validation is performed with accurate occultation timings. Methods. We processed the raw astrometric measurements of Gaia to obtain astrometric positions of moving objects with 1D sub-mas accuracy at the bright end. For each asteroid that we matched to the data, an orbit fitting was attempted in the form of the best fit of the initial conditions at the median epoch. The force model included Newtonian and relativistic accelerations to derive the observation equations, which were solved with a linear least-squares fit. Results. Orbits are provided in the form of state vectors in the International Celestial Reference Frame for 156 764 asteroids, including near-Earth objects, main-belt asteroids, and Trojans. For the asteroids with the best observations, the (formal) relative uncertainty σa/a is better than 10−10. Results are compared to orbits available from the Jet Propulsion Laboratory and MPC. Their orbits are based on much longer data arcs, but from positions of lower quality. The relative differences in semi-major axes have a mean of 5 × 10−10 and a scatter of 5 × 10−9.en
dc.description.versionversión publicada
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202347270
dc.identifier.issn1432-0746
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14468/12429
dc.journal.issueA38
dc.journal.titleAstronomy & Astrophysics
dc.journal.volume680
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherEDP Sciences
dc.relation.centerE.T.S. de Ingeniería Informática
dc.relation.departmentInteligencia Artificial
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.es
dc.subject.keywordsastrometry
dc.subject.keywordscelestial mechanics
dc.subject.keywordsminor planets
dc.subject.keywordsasteroids: general
dc.subject.keywordscatalogs
dc.titleGaia Focused Product Release:Asteroid orbital solution. Properties and assessmentes
dc.typejournal articleen
dc.typeartículoes
dspace.entity.typePublication
relation.isAuthorOfPublication9f881bbd-b55d-43bd-87b0-41f8f72cff48
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery9f881bbd-b55d-43bd-87b0-41f8f72cff48
Archivos
Bloque original
Mostrando 1 - 1 de 1
Cargando...
Miniatura
Nombre:
Sarro-Baro_LuisManuel_GFPRAsteroidOrbitalSolut.pdf
Tamaño:
6.41 MB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format