Publicación:
When logical conclusions go against beliefs: an ERP study

Vista sencilla de ítem
dc.contributor.authorRodríguez Gómez, Pablo
dc.contributor.authorRincón Pérez, Irene
dc.contributor.authorSantaniello, Gerardo
dc.contributor.authorPoch, Claudia
dc.contributor.authorPozo García, Miguel Ángel
dc.contributor.authorHinojosa, José Antonio
dc.contributor.authorMoreno Bella, Eva
dc.date.accessioned2024-05-20T11:54:54Z
dc.date.available2024-05-20T11:54:54Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.description.abstractReasoning is a fundamental human ability, vulnerable to error. According to behavioural measures, we are biased to consider valid the conclusion of an argument based on the veracity of the conclusion itself rather than on the formal logic of the argument. Nowadays, brain imaging techniques can be used to explore peoplés responses as they reason with linguistic materials. Using the Event-Related Potential technique in a categorical syllogism reading task, an N400 enhancement was found for the processing of invalid conclusions preceded by true premises (e.g. All men are mortal). By contrast, when initial premises consisted of socially prejudiced statements previously rated as false (e.g. All blond girls are dumb), valid rather than invalid conclusions enhanced the N400 response. Considering what the modulation of N400 indexes (i.e. word anticipation processes), our data suggests that people cannot follow the logic of an argument to anticipate upcoming words if they clash with veracity.en
dc.description.versionversión final
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/23273798.2017.1401649
dc.identifier.issn2327-3801
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14468/12707
dc.journal.issue6
dc.journal.titleLanguage, Cognition and Neuroscience
dc.journal.volume33
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherElsevier
dc.relation.centerFacultad de Psicología
dc.relation.departmentPsicología Evolutiva y de la Educación
dc.rightsAtribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0 Internacional
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
dc.subject.keywordsEvent-related potentials
dc.subject.keywordslanguage
dc.subject.keywordscategorical reasoning
dc.subject.keywordsN400
dc.titleWhen logical conclusions go against beliefs: an ERP studyes
dc.typeartículoes
dc.typejournal articleen
dspace.entity.typePublication
relation.isAuthorOfPublicationf6e40d0d-5a55-41dc-8125-497b2431c3c1
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscoveryf6e40d0d-5a55-41dc-8125-497b2431c3c1
Archivos
Bloque original
Mostrando 1 - 1 de 1
Miniatura
Nombre:
MorenoMontes_EvaMaria_Whenlogicalconclusions.pdf
Tamaño:
619.71 KB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Descargar
Colecciones
Artículos y papers