Publicación:
Comparison of Different Technologies for Integrated Solar Combined Cycles: Analysis of Concentrating Technology and Solar Integration

Vista sencilla de ítem
dc.contributor.authorSánchez, Consuelo
dc.contributor.authorAbbas, Rubén
dc.contributor.authorMuñoz Antón, Javier
dc.contributor.authorOrtega, Guillermo
dc.contributor.authorRovira de Antonio, Antonio José
dc.contributor.authorValdés Fernández, Manuel Tomás
dc.contributor.authorBarbero Fresno, Rubén
dc.contributor.authorMontes Pita, María José
dc.contributor.authorMuñoz Domínguez, Marta
dc.contributor.authorVarela Díez, Fernando
dc.date.accessioned2024-05-20T11:40:48Z
dc.date.available2024-05-20T11:40:48Z
dc.date.issued2018-04-25
dc.description.abstractThis paper compares the annual performance of Integrated Solar Combined Cycles (ISCCs) using different solar concentration technologies: parabolic trough collectors (PTC), linear Fresnel reflectors (LFR) and central tower receiver (CT). Each solar technology (i.e. PTC, LFR and CT) is proposed to integrate solar energy into the combined cycle in two different ways. The first one is based on the use of solar energy to evaporate water of the steam cycle by means of direct steam generation (DSG), increasing the steam production of the high pressure level of the steam generator. The other one is based on the use of solar energy to preheat the pressurized air at the exit of the gas turbine compressor before it is introduced in the combustion chamber, reducing the fuel consumption. Results show that ISCC with DSG increases the yearly production while solar air heating reduces it due to the incremental pressure drop. However, air heating allows significantly higher solar-to-electricity efficiencies and lower heat rates. Regarding the solar technologies, PTC provides the best thermal results.en
dc.description.versionversión publicada
dc.identifier.doihttp://doi.org/10.3390/en11051064
dc.identifier.issn1996-1073
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14468/12408
dc.journal.issue5
dc.journal.titleEnergies
dc.journal.volume11
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherMDPI
dc.relation.centerE.T.S. de Ingenieros Industriales
dc.relation.departmentIngeniería Energética
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.es
dc.subject.keywordsintegrated solar combined cycle
dc.subject.keywordsparabolic trough collector
dc.subject.keywordslinear Fresnel reflector
dc.subject.keywordscentral receiver system
dc.titleComparison of Different Technologies for Integrated Solar Combined Cycles: Analysis of Concentrating Technology and Solar Integrationes
dc.typejournal articleen
dc.typeartículoes
dspace.entity.typePublication
relation.isAuthorOfPublication2778703b-8202-477f-9cc1-0c00c51a94f6
relation.isAuthorOfPublicationf2a0b433-41c7-46cb-bc0a-4434ca81267a
relation.isAuthorOfPublicationfab0fd2f-585c-4864-97ec-1d58be32f955
relation.isAuthorOfPublicationbe2fc6ee-eb5b-4c79-9371-512b1eb6d042
relation.isAuthorOfPublication2e08d583-c5f7-46af-b814-d9dfbc1ab8e5
relation.isAuthorOfPublication385b91e5-fe41-43e1-bdb4-b78feade2eea
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery2778703b-8202-477f-9cc1-0c00c51a94f6
Archivos
Bloque original
Mostrando 1 - 1 de 1
Miniatura
Nombre:
Varela_Diez_Fernando_Comparison_of_Different.pdf
Tamaño:
452.87 KB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Descargar
Colecciones
Artículos y papers