Publicación: European Law primacy and the return of the constitutional limits: on the recent roar of the German constitution’s guardian
Cargando...
Fecha
2020
Autores
Editor/a
Director/a
Tutor/a
Coordinador/a
Prologuista
Revisor/a
Ilustrador/a
Derechos de acceso
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
Título de la revista
ISSN de la revista
Título del volumen
Editor
Thomson Reuters Aranzadi
Resumen
Recientemente hemos podido asistir a una revitalización del debate sobre la primacía del Derecho de la Unión Europea y los eventuales límites de la misma que algunos tribunales constitucionales defienden para preservar la identidad constitucional y otros principios esenciales del orden jurídico interno. El Tribunal Constitucional Federal alemán ha declarado, en sentencia de 5 de mayo de 2020, que la sentencia Weiss y otros del Tribunal de Justicia de la UE es ultra vires. La reacción mayoritaria institucional y doctrinal ha sido la de cuestionar la decisión del Tribunal alemán, así como el pluralismo constitucional que entienden está detrás de la misma. Este trabajo, desde una perspectiva abierta y plural, trata de aproximarse al debate constitucional, identificar algunos de los problemas existentes en el orden jurídico multinivel europeo, y defender que, no siendo las cosas fáciles, se hace más necesario que nunca huir de posiciones absolutas y buscar el diálogo entre tribunales.
There is a revitalization of the debate on the primacy of European Union law and the eventual limits defended by some constitutional courts in order to preserve constitutional identity and other essential principles of the internal legal order. The German Federal Constitutional Court has declared recently, in a judgment of 5th of May of 2020, that the Weiss and others judgment of the EU Court of Justice is ultra vires. The major part of the institutional and doctrinal reaction has been to question the decision of the German Court, as well as the constitutional pluralism that they understand is behind this decision. In this work, from an open and plural perspective, I try to make an approximation to the constitutional debate, and to identify some of the problems of the European multilevel legal order, and I also defend that, although things are not easy, it is more necessary than ever to avoid absolute positions and to seek the dialogue between courts.
There is a revitalization of the debate on the primacy of European Union law and the eventual limits defended by some constitutional courts in order to preserve constitutional identity and other essential principles of the internal legal order. The German Federal Constitutional Court has declared recently, in a judgment of 5th of May of 2020, that the Weiss and others judgment of the EU Court of Justice is ultra vires. The major part of the institutional and doctrinal reaction has been to question the decision of the German Court, as well as the constitutional pluralism that they understand is behind this decision. In this work, from an open and plural perspective, I try to make an approximation to the constitutional debate, and to identify some of the problems of the European multilevel legal order, and I also defend that, although things are not easy, it is more necessary than ever to avoid absolute positions and to seek the dialogue between courts.
Descripción
Categorías UNESCO
Palabras clave
Primacía, contralímites, identidad constitucional, pluralismo constitucional, constitucionalismo multinivel, Primacy, counter-limits, constitutional identity, constitutional pluralism, multi-level constitutionalism
Citación
Centro
Facultad de Derecho
Departamento
Derecho Constitucional