Publicación: Cambio en la política exterior de Catar, Emiratos Árabes Unidos y Kuwait tras La Primavera Árabe (2011-2019): un estudio comparado desde la Teoría de Roles
Cargando...
Fecha
2020-07-02
Autores
Editor/a
Director/a
Tutor/a
Coordinador/a
Prologuista
Revisor/a
Ilustrador/a
Derechos de acceso
Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0 Internacional
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
Título de la revista
ISSN de la revista
Título del volumen
Editor
Universidad Nacional de Educación a Distancia (España). Instituto Universitario "General Gutiérrez Mellado"
Resumen
La inestabilidad regional que trajo consigo la Primavera Árabe supuso una oportunidad para que algunos Estados de la región pudiesen maximizar su presencia y capacidad de influencia mediante un cambio en sus políticas exteriores. Estados pequeños como Catar y Emiratos Árabes Unidos reorientaron su acción exterior para penetrar en los Estados desestabilizados mientras que Kuwait mantuvo sus tradicionales patrones de conducta. Este estudio busca explicar por qué países con grandes similitudes como Catar, Emiratos Árabes Unidos y Kuwait ejecutaron políticas exteriores diferentes. Aplicando la teoría de roles de Holsti mediante la combinación de estrategias comparativas y de estudios de caso se demostrará que, ante este escenario de desestabilización, la presencia de liderazgos nacionalistas en Catar en el periodo 2011-2013 y Emiratos Árabes Unidos en el periodo 2011-2019 motivó la concepción y el desempeño de un rol activista en su política exterior hacia el Mundo Árabe.
The political instability brought by the Arab Spring was the chance for some regional States to increase their power and influence across the region by changing their foreign policies. On the one hand, small States like Qatar or United Arab Emirates redirected their foreign policies in order to penetrate other regional States who were suffering political crisis or conflicts. On the other hand, Kuwait preserved its traditional regional behavior. The major goal of this research is to answer why those three countries executed different policies. In order to achieve that goal, it will be used both comparative and case studies approaches from Holsti’s Role Theory. The expected result is to prove that, before unstable regional environments, nationalist leaderships from Qatar (2011-2013) and United Arab Emirates (2011-2019) caused foreign policy changes by adopting activist roles in order to increase their power.
The political instability brought by the Arab Spring was the chance for some regional States to increase their power and influence across the region by changing their foreign policies. On the one hand, small States like Qatar or United Arab Emirates redirected their foreign policies in order to penetrate other regional States who were suffering political crisis or conflicts. On the other hand, Kuwait preserved its traditional regional behavior. The major goal of this research is to answer why those three countries executed different policies. In order to achieve that goal, it will be used both comparative and case studies approaches from Holsti’s Role Theory. The expected result is to prove that, before unstable regional environments, nationalist leaderships from Qatar (2011-2013) and United Arab Emirates (2011-2019) caused foreign policy changes by adopting activist roles in order to increase their power.
Descripción
Categorías UNESCO
Palabras clave
petromonarquías del golfo Pérsico, Oriente Medio, concepción de rol, desempeño de rol, prescripción de rol, petro-Monarchies of the Gulf, Middle East, role conception, role performance, role prescription
Citación
Centro
Instituto Universitario Gutierrez Mellado (IUGM )