Publicación:
Linking bond theory to drift theory

dc.contributor.authorSerrano Maíllo, Alfonso
dc.date.accessioned2024-05-20T18:48:37Z
dc.date.available2024-05-20T18:48:37Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.description.abstractIn this chapter, I describe Matza’s drift theory of crime, which is the first theoretical effort to grant a causal role to morality. I then point to the main difficulties in drift theory, and I try to show that Hirschi’s bond theory is an effort to address and overcome those difficulties. At the same time, bond theory retains some of the main causal mechanisms proposed by drift theory. In relation to its partner, bond theory removes redundancy, relies on an improved version of compatibilism, and proposes a sounder causal mechanism according to which bonds are impediments. As a consequence, bond theory rejects drift theory theoretically, as well as empirically. At the same time, bond theory is built on drift theory, and it offers an improved version of it. Thus, bond theory can be understood as an example of theoretical evolution in criminology.en
dc.description.versionversión final
dc.identifier.isbn978-0-367-03101-5
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14468/15406
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherRoutledge
dc.relation.centerFacultad de Derecho
dc.relation.departmentDerecho Penal y Criminología
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
dc.titleLinking bond theory to drift theoryes
dc.typebook parten
dc.typecapítulo de libroes
dspace.entity.typePublication
relation.isAuthorOfPublication32d0a0cc-7bda-430e-9246-bcd2c7cda178
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery32d0a0cc-7bda-430e-9246-bcd2c7cda178
Archivos
Colecciones