Fecha
1999-07
Editor/a
Director/a
Tutor/a
Coordinador/a
Prologuista
Revisor/a
Ilustrador/a
Derechos de acceso
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
Título de la revista
ISSN de la revista
Título del volumen
Editor
Springer
Resumen
One experiment provided evidence in support of Gibson, Pearlmutter, Canseco-Gonzalez, and Hickok’s (1996) claim that a recency preference applies to Spanish relative clause attachments, contrary to the claim made by Cuetos and Mitchell (1988). Spanish speakers read stimuli involving either two or three potential attachment sites in which the same lexical content of the two-site conditions appeared in a different structural configuration in the three-site conditions. High attachment was easier than low attachment when only two sites were present, but low attachment was preferred over high attachment, which was in turn preferred over middle attachment, when three sites were present. The experiment replicated earlier results and showed that (1) attachment preferences are determined in part by a preference to attach recently/low, and (2) lexical biases are insufficient to explain attachment preferences.
Descripción
The registered version of this article, first published in “Memory & Cognition 27, 603–611", is available online at the publisher's: Springer Nature, https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03211554
La versión registrada de este artículo, publicado por primera vez en “Memory & Cognition 27, 603–611", está disponible en línea en el sitio web del editor: Springer Nature, https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03211554
La versión registrada de este artículo, publicado por primera vez en “Memory & Cognition 27, 603–611", está disponible en línea en el sitio web del editor: Springer Nature, https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03211554
Categorías UNESCO
Palabras clave
Citación
Gibson, E., Pearlmutter, N.J. & Torrens, V. (1999) Recency and lexical preferences in Spanish. Memory & Cognition 27, 603–611. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03211554
Centro
Facultad de Psicología
Departamento
Psicología Evolutiva y de la Educación