Persona:
Amigo Cabrera, Enrique

Foto de perfil
Dirección de correo electrónico
ORCID
0000-0003-1482-824X
Fecha de nacimiento
Proyectos de investigación
Unidades organizativas
Puesto de trabajo
Apellidos
Amigo Cabrera
Nombre de pila
Enrique
Nombre

Filtros

2009 - 200912010 - 20203
Restablecer filtros

Ajustes

Tipo: artículo ×

Resultados de la búsqueda

Mostrando 1 - 4 de 4
  • Miniatura
    Publicación
    Automatic Generation of Entity-Oriented Summaries for Reputation Management
    (Springer, 2020-04-01) Rodríguez Vidal, Javier; Verdejo, Julia; Carrillo de Albornoz Cuadrado, Jorge Amando; Amigo Cabrera, Enrique; Plaza Morales, Laura; Gonzalo Arroyo, Julio Antonio
    Producing online reputation summaries for an entity (company, brand, etc.) is a focused summarization task with a distinctive feature: issues that may affect the reputation of the entity take priority in the summary. In this paper we (i) present a new test collection of manually created (abstractive and extractive) reputation reports which summarize tweet streams for 31 companies in the banking and automobile domains; (ii) propose a novel methodology to evaluate summaries in the context of online reputation monitoring, which profits from an analogy between reputation reports and the problem of diversity in search; and (iii) provide empirical evidence that producing reputation reports is different from a standard summarization problem, and incorporating priority signals is essential to address the task effectively.
  • Miniatura
    Publicación
    EvALL: Open Access Evaluation for Information Access Systems
    (Association for Computing Machinery (ACM), 2017) Almagro Cádiz, Mario; Rodríguez Vidal, Javier; Verdejo, Felisa; Amigo Cabrera, Enrique; Carrillo de Albornoz Cuadrado, Jorge Amando; Gonzalo Arroyo, Julio Antonio
    The EvALL online evaluation service aims to provide a unified evaluation framework for Information Access systems that makes results completely comparable and publicly available for the whole research community. For researchers working on a given test collection, the framework allows to: (i) evaluate results in a way compliant with measurement theory and with state-of-the-art evaluation practices in the field; (ii) quantitatively and qualitatively compare their results with the state of the art; (iii) provide their results as reusable data to the scientific community; (iv) automatically generate evaluation figures and (low-level) interpretation of the results, both as a pdf report and as a latex source. For researchers running a challenge (a comparative evaluation campaign on shared data), the framework helps them to manage, store and evaluate submissions, and to preserve ground truth and system output data for future use by the research community. EvALL can be tested at http://evall.uned.es.
  • Miniatura
    Publicación
    Combining evaluation metrics via the unanimous improvement ratio and its application in weps clustering task
    (Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence, 2011-12-01) Artiles, Javier; Verdejo, Felisa; Amigo Cabrera, Enrique; Gonzalo Arroyo, Julio Antonio
    Many Artificial Intelligence tasks cannot be evaluated with a single quality criterion and some sort of weighted combination is needed to provide system rankings. A problem of weighted combination measures is that slight changes in the relative weights may produce substantial changes in the system rankings. This paper introduces the Unanimous Improvement Ratio (UIR), a measure that complements standard metric combination criteria (such as van Rijsbergen's F-measure) and indicates how robust the measured differences are to changes in the relative weights of the individual metrics. UIR is meant to elucidate whether a perceived difference between two systems is an artifact of how individual metrics are weighted. Besides discussing the theoretical foundations of UIR, this paper presents empirical results that confirm the validity and usefulness of the metric for the Text Clustering problem, where there is a tradeoff between precision and recall based metrics and results are particularly sensitive to the weighting scheme used to combine them. Remarkably, our experiments show that UIR can be used as a predictor of how well differences between systems measured on a given test bed will also hold in a different test bed.
  • Miniatura
    Publicación
    A comparison of extrinsic clustering evaluation metrics based on formal constraints
    (Springer, 2009-05-11) Artiles, Javier; Verdejo, Felisa; Amigo Cabrera, Enrique; Gonzalo Arroyo, Julio Antonio
    There is a wide set of evaluation metrics available to compare the quality of text clustering algorithms. In this article, we define a few intuitive formal constraints on such metrics which shed light on which aspects of the quality of a clustering are captured by different metric families. These formal constraints are validated in an experiment involving human assessments, and compared with other constraints proposed in the literature. Our analysis of a wide range of metrics shows that only BCubed satisfies all formal constraints. We also extend the analysis to the problem of overlapping clustering, where items can simultaneously belong to more than one cluster. As Bcubed cannot be directly applied to this task, we propose a modified version of Bcubed that avoids the problems found with other metrics.