Persona: Orenes Casanova, Isabel
Cargando...
Dirección de correo electrónico
ORCID
0000-0002-8677-2399
Fecha de nacimiento
Proyectos de investigación
Unidades organizativas
Puesto de trabajo
Apellidos
Orenes Casanova
Nombre de pila
Isabel
Nombre
2 resultados
Resultados de la búsqueda
Mostrando 1 - 2 de 2
Publicación “Looking at” Negation: Faster Processing for Symbolic Rather Than Iconic Representations(Springer, 2021) Orenes Casanova, IsabelMany studies have shown the double processing of negation, suggesting that negation integration into sentence meaning is delayed. This contrasts with some researches that have found that such integration is rather immediate. The present study contributes to this debate. Affirmative and negative compound sentences (e.g., “because he was not hungry, he did not order a salad”) were presented orally in a visual world paradigm while four printed words were on the screen: salad, no salad, soup, and no soup. The eye-tracking data showed two different fixation patterns for negative causal assertions, which are linked to differences in the representation and inferential demands. One indicates that negation is integrated immediately, as people look at the explicit negation (e.g., no salad) very early. The other, in which people look at the alternate (e.g., soup) much later, indicates that what is delayed in time is the representation of the alternate. These results support theories that combine iconic and symbolic representations, such as the model theory.Publicación Illusory inferences in conditional expressions(Springer, 2024-04-30) Espino, Orlando; Orenes Casanova, Isabel; Moreno Rios, Sergio; https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4876-3643; https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5553-207XA robber points a gun at a cashier and says: “Only one of these two options is true: If you conceal the combination to the safe, then I kill you; otherwise, if you don´t conceal the combination to the safe, then I kill you.” Hearing this statement, most people conclude that, in either case, “I kill you.” This is an illusory response, in fact; the valid conclusion states “I don´t kill you.” The research reported here studied the roles that different expressions of conditionals (“if-then,” “only if,” and “if and only if”) play in the illusory response. Three experiments show that participants inferred the conclusion “I kill you” from the conditional “if-then” and “I may or may not kill you” from the conditional “only if,” while selecting both options with similar frequency for the biconditional “if and only if.” These results shed light on the main theories of deductive reasoning.