Persona:
Mayas Arellano, Julia

Foto de perfil
Dirección de correo electrónico
ORCID
0000-0001-5003-4995
Fecha de nacimiento
Proyectos de investigación
Unidades organizativas
Puesto de trabajo
Apellidos
Mayas Arellano
Nombre de pila
Julia
Nombre

Filtros

2018 - 201922020 - 20241
Restablecer filtros

Ajustes

Tiene archivos: true × search.filters.applied.f.itemDepartamento: Psicología Básica I ×

Resultados de la búsqueda

Mostrando 1 - 3 de 3
  • Miniatura
    Publicación
    Memory and metamemory in everyday settings: Assessing recall, recognition, and naming using car brand logos
    (Wiley, 2024-01-01) Mayas Arellano, Julia; Prieto Lara, Antonio; Montoro Martínez, Pedro Raúl
    Previous research on incidental memory in everyday settings has shown that frequent exposure to stimuli does not guarantee accurate representation in memory. In two studies, we explored the memory and metamemory of car brand logos using recall (drawing) and recognition tasks (Study 1) or a naming task (Study 2). The results showed that memory accuracy for logos was modest in the recall and recognition tasks; nevertheless, the participants' accuracy in naming the visually displayed car logos was almost perfect. The participants showed overconfidence in their ability to recall and recognize car logos prior to their performance, which was adjusted after completing the recall task. Overconfidence was absent in the naming tasks. These results replicate the modest visual memory and metacognitive adjustments in recall and recognition tasks found in previous studies and contrast with participants' better memory performance and metacognitive adjustments in the naming task.
  • Miniatura
    Publicación
    Interaction dynamics between grouping principles in touch: phenomenological and psychophysical evidence
    (Springer, 2018-05-24) Prieto Lara, Antonio; Mayas Arellano, Julia; Ballesteros Jiménez, Soledad
    In two experiments, we investigated the interactions between the grouping principles of spatial proximity and texture similarity in touch. For that purpose, we adapted to touch two paradigms widely employed in vision. In Experiment 1, we used an experimental phenomenological task consisting of rating the strength of grouping in both acting alone and conjoined cooperative and competitive conditions. In Experiment 2, participants performed a psychophysical task in which an objective (in)correct response was defined by selectively attending to one grouping cue in different blocks of trials. The results showed that spatial proximity dominated over texture similarity when the two principles were conjoined in competition. In addition, the present results are compatible with an additive model of grouping effects as indicated by the greater grouping effect in the cooperative condition and the smaller grouping effect in the competitive condition relative to a.0cting alone grouping principles. The similarities and differences between vision and touch are discussed.
  • Miniatura
    Publicación
    Behavioral and electrophysiological correlates of interactions between grouping principles in touch: Evidence from psychophysical indirect tasks
    (Elsevier, 2019-06-01) Prieto Lara, Antonio; Mayas Arellano, Julia; Ballesteros Jiménez, Soledad
    In two experiments we investigated the behavioral and brain correlates of the interactions between spatial-proximity and texture-similarity grouping principles in touch. We designed two adaptations of the repetition discrimination task (RDT) previously used in vision. This task provides an indirect measure of grouping that does not require explicit attention to the grouping process. In Experiment 1, participants were presented with a row of elements alternating in texture except for one pair in which the same texture was repeated. The participants had to decide whether the repeated texture stimuli (similarity grouping) were smooth or rough, while the spatial proximity between targets and distractors was varied either to facilitate or hinder the response. In Experiment 2, participants indicated which cohort (proximity grouping) contained more elements, while texture-similarity within and between cohorts was modified. The results indicated additive effects of grouping cues in which proximity dominated the perceptual grouping process when the two principles acted together. In addition, the independent component analysis (ICA) performed on electrophysiological data revealed the implication of a widespread network of sensorimotor, prefrontal, parietal and occipital brain areas in both experiments.