Persona:
Bernal Guerrero, Claudio

Foto de perfil
Dirección de correo electrónico
ORCID
Fecha de nacimiento
Proyectos de investigación
Unidades organizativas
Puesto de trabajo
Apellidos
Bernal Guerrero
Nombre de pila
Claudio
Nombre

Filtros

2019 - 201912020 - 20211
Restablecer filtros

Ajustes

Resultados de la búsqueda

Mostrando 1 - 2 de 2
  • Miniatura
    Publicación
    An Experimental and Numerical Analysis of the Compression of Bimetallic Cylinders
    (MDPI, 2019-12-07) Herrero, José Manuel; Aragón, Ana María; Lorenzo Martín, Cinta; Yanguas Gil, Ángel; Martins, Paulo A. F.; Camacho López, Ana María; Rodríguez Prieto, Álvaro; Bernal Guerrero, Claudio
    This paper investigates the upsetting of bimetallic cylinders with an aluminum alloy center and a brass ring. The influence of the center-ring shape factor and type of assembly fit (interference and clearance), and the effect of friction on the compression force and ductile damage are comprehensively analyzed by means of a combined numerical-experimental approach. Results showed that the higher the shape factor, the lower the forces required, whereas the effect of friction is especially important for cylinders with the lowest shape factors. The type of assembly fit does not influence the compression force. The accumulated ductile damage in the compression of bimetallic cylinders is higher than in single-material cylinders, and the higher the shape factor, the lower the damage for the same amount of stroke. The highest values of damaged were found to occur at the middle plane, and typically in the ring. Results also showed that an interference fit was more favorable for preventing fracture of the ring than a clearance fit. Microstructural analysis by scanning electron microscopy revealed a good agreement with the finite element predicted distribution of ductile damage.
  • Miniatura
    Publicación
    An approach to evaluating and benchmarking the mechanical behavior of a surgical mesh prototype designed for the repair of abdominal wall defects
    (Elsevier, 2021-10-28) García García, Carlos; Carrascal Morillo, MT; Castell Gómez, J.T.; Bernal Guerrero, Claudio; García Prada, Juan Carlos; https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3313-6556; https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2807-9182; https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0792-907X
    Ventral hernia repair is a common surgical procedure in abdominal surgery in which surgical mesh has become an essential tool to improve outcomes. To avoid recurrences the mesh needs to mimic the mechanical behavior of the abdominal wall. In this scenario the mechanical properties at the interface between the mesh and its surrounding tissue is critical for the performance of the device and, therefore, the success after surgery. We aimed to characterize and compare the mechanical behavior of the patented prototype mesh Spider and four commercial meshes at the mesh-tissue interface. The prototype mesh was designed based on the hypothesis that the best performance for a large-sized defect in a ventral hernia is obtained when the mesh presents an isotropic behavior. In contrast, commercial meshes presented significant anisotropic behavior. Mechanical properties of the meshes were characterized through uniaxial tensile tests. Longitudinal and transverse axes were defined for each mesh, and samples were cut in each axis orientation. Samples underwent uniaxial tensile testing, from which the elastic modulus in each axis was determined. The degree of anisotropy was calculated as the ratio between the elastic modulus in each axis. An in silico model of the ventral hernia defect was designed to simulate the mesh-tissue interface behavior via finite element method. Meshes were modelled by an hyperelastic orthotropic constitutive model, which allowed isotropic symmetry as particular case for the prototype mesh. Abdominal wall was modelled using a Neo-Hookean model. Once the simulations were launched, mesh-tissue interface behavior was evaluated through the difference between Von Mises stress values on either size of the interface, both on the external and the internal face of the mesh and abdominal wall. Mechanical response was anisotropic for all commercial meshes and isotropic for the Spider prototype. Among commercial, Ultrapro® was highly anisotropic. Tests revealed Gore-Tex® to be the stiffest, followed by Repol Angimesh® , Spider and Ultrapro®; Duramesh was found to be the most compliant. Concerning mesh-tissue behavior, simulation results revealed the Spider prototype and Duramesh to be the best; Spider due to its uniformity and lower stress difference thanks to its nearly isotropic behavior, and Duramesh due to its compliant behavior. Our results suggest that the compromise between stiffness and anisotropy must be considered in order to improve the mechanical performance of the meshes, bearing in mind that for large-sized ventral defects, nearly isotropic mesh ensures better performance.