Persona:
Brescó de Luna, Ignacio

Foto de perfil
Dirección de correo electrónico
ORCID
0000-0001-8044-7643
Fecha de nacimiento
Proyectos de investigación
Unidades organizativas
Puesto de trabajo
Apellidos
Brescó de Luna
Nombre de pila
Ignacio
Nombre

Filtros

2019 - 201912020 - 20222
Restablecer filtros

Ajustes

Autor: Wagoner, Brady × search.filters.applied.f.itemFacultad: Facultad de Psicología ×

Resultados de la búsqueda

Mostrando 1 - 3 de 3
  • Miniatura
    Publicación
    The psychology of modern memorials: the affective intertwining of personal and collective memories
    (Sage Journals, 2019-03-01) Brescó de Luna, Ignacio; Wagoner, Brady; Brescó de Luna, Ignacio; https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8044-7643; https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0731-4048
    This paper explores collective memory and grief as they are experienced and expressed at modern memorial sites. What makes them collective is the way they are interpreted and felt as a ‘we’, in first-person plural. From a cultural psychological perspective, we conceptualize memorials as cultural and historical artefacts that mediate these processes and in so doing give meaning to the past based on present and future challenges. Along these lines, we analyse visitors’ situated and evolving experiences of two memorial sites: Memorial to the Murdered Jews of Europe in Berlin and the Ground Zero National September 11 Memorial in New York. Results focus on individuals’ particular modes of experiencing and appropriating modern memorial sites, which in contrast to classic ones are purposely built to generate a wide range of different meaning-making processes and ways of interacting with them.
  • Miniatura
    Publicación
    Memorials from the perspective of experience: A comparison of Spain’s Valley of the Fallen to contemporary counter-memorials.
    (SAGE Publications, 2022-09-29) Brescó de Luna, Ignacio; Wagoner, Brady; Brescó de Luna, Ignacio; https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8044-7643; https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0731-4048
    Memorials are cultural artifacts constructed to mediate memory for a shared past. But as such, they require people’s active engagement with them, which can generate divergent experiences and interpretations. The present study compares how different memorial forms both enable and constrain people’s relating to the sites and what they are meant to represent. The comparison hinges on the difference between traditional memorials (imposing, vertical, and focused on heroes) and counter-memorials (engaging, horizontal, and focused on victims). The Valley of the Fallen is in central focus as a prime example of a traditional memory, which is currently in the process of being re-signified. Our study compares participants’ experience of this site with the Memorial to the Murdered Jews of Europe and the National 9/11 Memorial (both celebrated counter-memorials), using an innovative method combining interviews and a subjective camera that captures participants’ ongoing experience from the first-person perspective. Results show a manifold of ways in which people appropriate and make sense of memorials through different associations and personal memories while moving through them.
  • Miniatura
    Publicación
    Memorials as Healing Places: A Matrix for Bridging Material Design and Visitor Experience
    (1660-4601, 2022-05-31) Wagoner, Brady; Brescó de Luna, Ignacio; Brescó de Luna, Ignacio; https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0731-4048; https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8044-7643
    Memorials are increasingly used to encourage people to reflect on the past and work through both individual and collective wounds. While much has been written on the history, architectural forms and controversies surrounding memorials, surprisingly little has been done to explore how visitors experience and appropriate them. This paper aims to analyze how different material aspects of memorial design help to create engaging experiences for visitors. It outlines a matrix of ten interconnected dimensions for comparison: (1) use of the vertical and horizontal axis, (2) figurative and abstract representation, (3) spatial immersion and separation, (4) mobility, (5) multisensory qualities, (6) reflective surfaces, (7) names, (8) place of burial, (9) accommodating ritual, and (10) location and surroundings. With this outline, the paper hopes to provide social scientists and practitioners (e.g., architects, planners, curators, facilitators, guides) with a set of key points for reflection on existing and future memorials and possibilities for enhancing visitor engagement with them.