Rossi, Federico M.2025-02-032025-02-032017Rossi, F. M. (2017). Compulsion mechanisms: state-movement dynamics in Buenos Aires. Social Movement Studies, 16(5), 578–594. https://doi.org/10.1080/14742837.2017.13445451474-2837 | eISSN 1474-2829https://doi.org/10.1080/14742837.2017.1344545https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14468/25790The registered version of this article, first published in “Social Movement Studies, 16, 2017", is available online at the publisher's website: Taylor & Francis, https://doi.org/10.1080/14742837.2017.1344545 La versión registrada de este artículo, publicado por primera vez en “Social Movement Studies, 16, 2017", está disponible en línea en el sitio web del editor: Taylor & Francis, https://doi.org/10.1080/14742837.2017.1344545The article reveals and explains the workings of generally ignored mechanism of state–movement interaction proposed by Charles Tilly, namely the compulsion mechanism. Specifically, two types of compulsion mechanisms will be defined: compulsive support and compulsive control. In both types, without using physical repression, the state’s institutions reinforce the movement’s identity while also prompting it to adapt its repertoire of strategies to the state institutions’ requirements. Empirically, this article focuses on the interaction of the assembly movement with the state in the City of Buenos Aires. This movement emerged as a result of the socioeconomic and political crises of 2001–2002 in Argentina. Based on ethnographic fieldwork and archival research, the purpose is to unpack how the assembly movement’s identities and strategies were built and how its interaction with the state evolved.eninfo:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess59 Ciencia Política::5906 Sociología políticaartículoState–movements interactionsurban politicsurban movementspopular assembliesneighborhood assembliesLatin Americarelational analysisCharles Tilly