Mazzetti, GretaRobledo, EnriqueVignoli, MichelaTopa Cantisano, Gabriela ElbaGuglielmi, DinaSchaufeli, Wilmar B2024-10-102024-10-102021-12-10Mazzetti, G., Robledo, E., Vignoli, M., Topa, G., Guglielmi, D., & Schaufeli, W. B. (2023). Work Engagement: A meta-Analysis Using the Job Demands-Resources Model. Psychological Reports, 126(3), 1069-1107. https://doi.org/10.1177/003329412110519880033-2941 Online ISSN: 1558-691Xhttps://doi.org/10.1177/00332941211051988https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14468/24000Although the construct of work engagement has been extensively explored, a systematic meta-analysis based on a consistent categorization of engagement antecedents, outcomes, and well-being correlates is still lacking. The results of prior research reporting 533 correlations from 113 independent samples (k = 94, n = 119,420) were coded using a meta-analytic approach. The effect size for development resources (r =.45) and personal resources (r = .48) was higher than for social resources (r = .36) and for job resources (r = .37). Among the outcomes and well-being correlates explored, the effect size was highest for job satisfaction (r = .60) and commitment (r = .63). Furthermore, moderation analysis showed that (a) concerning the occupational role, work engagement finds a low association with turnover intention among civil servants, volunteer workers, and educators; (b) collectivist cultural environments reported a greater association of feedback with engagement than individualistic environments; (c) the relationship between personal resources and engagement was stronger among workers with university degrees than workers with high school diplomas. Furthermore, the absorption dimension showed a lower effect with all variables under investigation than vigor and dedication.eninfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess61 Psicologíaartículowork engagementmeta-analysisjob demands-R modelenergy compassjob resourcespersonal resources