Kulich, ClaraWillis, Guillermo B.Moya, MiguelRodríguez Bailón, RosaMoreno Bella, Eva2024-05-202024-05-202023-04-240022-4545; eISSN 1940-1183https://doi.org/10.1080/00224545.2023.2192398https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14468/12717Economic inequality has consequences at the social-psychological level, such as in the way people make inferences about their environment and other people. In the present two preregistered studies, we used a paradigm of an organizational setting to manipulate economic inequality and measured ascriptions of agentic versus communal traits to employees and the self. In Study 1 (N = 187), participants attributed more agency than communion to a middle-status employee, and more communion than agency when economic equality was salient. In Study 2 (N = 198) this finding was replicated. Further, this inequality-agency association was explained by perceptions of competitive employee relationships. Results, moreover, suggested that participants mainly attributed more communion than agency to themselves in the equality condition. We conclude that agency and communion ascriptions may be functional and thus inform about the expectations people have on the nature of social relationships in the face of economic inequality.enAtribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0 Internacionalinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessWage (In)equality Matters: The Effect of Organizational Economic Inequality on Others’ and Self-Ascriptionsartículoeconomic inequalityequalityagency and communionsocial perceptioncompetitionActitudes hacia la desigualdad