Sánchez, ConsueloAbbas, RubénMuñoz Antón, JavierOrtega, GuillermoRovira de Antonio, Antonio JoséValdés Fernández, Manuel TomásBarbero Fresno, RubénMontes Pita, María JoséMuñoz Domínguez, MartaVarela Díez, Fernando2024-05-202024-05-202018-04-251996-107310.3390/en11051064https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14468/12408This paper compares the annual performance of Integrated Solar Combined Cycles (ISCCs) using different solar concentration technologies: parabolic trough collectors (PTC), linear Fresnel reflectors (LFR) and central tower receiver (CT). Each solar technology (i.e. PTC, LFR and CT) is proposed to integrate solar energy into the combined cycle in two different ways. The first one is based on the use of solar energy to evaporate water of the steam cycle by means of direct steam generation (DSG), increasing the steam production of the high pressure level of the steam generator. The other one is based on the use of solar energy to preheat the pressurized air at the exit of the gas turbine compressor before it is introduced in the combustion chamber, reducing the fuel consumption. Results show that ISCC with DSG increases the yearly production while solar air heating reduces it due to the incremental pressure drop. However, air heating allows significantly higher solar-to-electricity efficiencies and lower heat rates. Regarding the solar technologies, PTC provides the best thermal results.enAtribución 4.0 Internacionalinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessartículointegrated solar combined cycleparabolic trough collectorlinear Fresnel reflectorcentral receiver system