The Argumentative Uses of Emotive Language

Fabrizio Macagno and Douglas Walton . () The Argumentative Uses of Emotive Language.

Ficheros (Some files may be inaccessible until you login with your e-spacio credentials)
Nombre Descripción Tipo MIME Size
Documento.pdf Enter a label here. application/pdf

Título The Argumentative Uses of Emotive Language
Autor(es) Fabrizio Macagno
Douglas Walton
Resumen This paper analyzes selected examples of uses of argumentation tactics that exploit emotive language, many of them criticized as deceptive and even fallacious by classical and recent sources, including current informal logic textbooks. The analysis is based on six argumentation schemes, and an account of the dialectical setting in which these schemes are used. The three conclusions are (1) that such uses of emotive language are often reasonable and necessary in argumentation based on values, (2) but that they are defeasible, and hence need to be seen as open to critical questioning (3) and that when they are used fallaciously, it is because they interfere with critical questioning or conceal the need for it. The analysis furnishes criteria for distinguishing between arguments based on the use of emotive words that are reasonable tools of persuasion, and those that are fallacious tactics used to conceal and distort information.
Cobertura 2
Identificador bibliuned:rev-ibe-argu-2010-1-0002
Versión de la publicación publishedVersion
Tipo de recurso Article
Derechos de acceso y licencia
Tipo de acceso Acceso abierto

Versión Tipo de filtro
Contador de citas: Google Scholar Search Google Scholar
Estadísticas de acceso: 211 Visitas, 108 Descargas  -  Estadísticas en detalle
Creado: Wed, 01 Apr 2009, 11:34:11 CET